|
|
|
|
|
Number 29: Winter 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
Now that the key elements of the license alignment have been identified, the next step is to define the metrics that should be integrated in the license agreement. Aligning the License Agreement As discussed, many license agreements do not reflect key marketing objectives and/or include terms that properly leverage the brand. Typically, the focus of these agreements is on financial terms such as royalty rates and minimum royalty guarantees, and as a result, the licensee’s performance is based on metrics that do not emphasize or measure the marketing benefits that are desired by both parties. Although sales and royalties are important, there are certain key performance indicators or metrics that can be incorporated into the license agreement that better reflect the interests of licensor and licensee. The following examples illustrate the type of metrics that can be used in the license agreement to create alignment and measure performance. These metrics can become requirements that are incorporated directly into the license agreement (versus targets in a ‘marketing plan’). Whatever metrics are used, the licensor and licensee need to gain agreement on these requirements to ensure that they are appropriately reflect their objectives and maximize the business potential.
Many industries and markets are changing rapidly. License relationships are not immune to these market forces. The license relationship and agreement may be out of alignment if the license terms do not reflect key changes in the market. Although revising the terms in a license can be challenging, a third party experienced in brand licensing can assist to mediate licensing issues and develop solutions that can be incorporated into the agreement. The rewards from a license alignment are often worthwhile. The development of metrics that reflect key marketing objectives can strengthen the license relationship and help to improve the management of the licensed business. |
|
Pool Version 2.0 © Kirk Martensen / Through the Loop Consulting Ltd 1998-2005 |
|