Modern
marketing in developed societies is all about the artful
creation and communications management of thematic
spaces. Thematic spaces are the definitional categories
within which products and services are positioned,
categorized and described, and within which they are
therefore considered for purchase by consumers. These
thematic spaces sometimes change due to consumers’
evolving purchasing and product-use habits, and they
change as well because marketers, for all sorts of
reasons, make creative decisions about new ways to urge
consumers to think about, purchase and use companies’
products and services.
Simple
examples of changing thematic spaces in modern American
advertising can be seen in the cases of toothpaste,
baking soda and aspirin. In earlier times, toothpaste
was a necessary dentifrice simply used to clean one’s
teeth; as such, it was firmly housed in the thematic
space of hygienic toiletries. Today, many brands of
toothpaste are marketed and advertised within the
thematic space of cosmetics, with messages about
toothpaste emphasizing its teeth-whitening and
smile-enhancing features rather than its cleansing
properties. Similarly, baking soda was once marketed in
the thematic space of a cooking ingredient, whereas now
in current marketing and advertising practice it is sold
primarily as a household cleansing and air-freshening
agent. As for aspirin, who could have anticipated
decades ago that aspirin would now be marketed less in
the thematic space of pain reliever than in the space of
over-the-counter medicine for the heart?
There are
clear dangers inherent in not properly attending to the
appropriateness of one’s thematic spaces. Marketers less
careful of the rightness of their thematic spaces may
find, for example, that they have in the marketplace
brilliantly created and produced advertising on the
wrong subject, i.e. in the wrong thematic space.
There are
countless other examples of shifting thematic spaces,
ranging from numerous examples in consumer packaged
goods to lifestyle-enhancement products. So thematic
spaces rise, fall and change, and new ones are created
and others disappear, as consumers and marketers in
highly developed economies continue the ever more
sophisticated process of buying, selling and consuming
traditional and new products and services.
The best
marketers are continually monitoring the robustness and
consumer relevance of the thematic spaces in which their
wares and ideas appear; and when, for example, the
competitive situation requires it, they are able
seamlessly to migrate from one thematic space to
another, thereby increasing the appeal and topicality of
their products and services.
The idea of
thematic spaces and their relevance to, indeed their
criticality to, the marketing of ideas and products,
raises the question of the need marketers have to make
an early priority the necessary work that must be done
in the initial stages of marketing development to
artfully define the thematic space in which the
marketing communications are to work, and indeed to
devise the pricing, packaging and method of distribution
of products and services commensurate with the chosen
thematic space.
I believe
that it is often the case that commercial failures are
the result of marketing practitioners having chosen
ineffective thematic spaces for the products and
services they market. No matter how effective the
marketing communications are, they will ultimately fail
if they appear in the marketplace in the context of the
wrong thematic space. Such was the situation with much
of professional sport in the United States several
decades ago. Baseball, for example, had fallen on hard
times, with attendance down and a significant number of
the professional teams being shopped as distressed
merchandise. The rebounding of baseball has been less
attributable to some new popular interest in the game
itself, but rather its having been creatively marketed
as family entertainment rather than as pure sport.
The same is
true of professional basketball, as anyone who attends
the games can readily see. Young families go to these
games as a form of exciting entertainment with the
on-court basketball action frequently punctuated with
outlandish contests, stunts and giveaways designed to
distract, entertain and amaze those in attendance. Even
if the sports purists among us object to this
circus-like entertainment overlay to their beloved
games, the carnival atmosphere around sports has
undoubtedly helped rescue sports like professional
basketball from falling patronage, that’s for sure.
The
assumption by some marketing people that the thematic
spaces in which their products are described are correct
and stable and therefore require no periodic
investigation and re-consideration is often the root
cause, I believe, of tired, ineffective marketing and
resulting declining consumer appeal. Every so often wise
marketers would do well to re-visit the question of the
thematic spaces their communications are mining, so that
they are sure that no re-positioning within the same or
alternative thematic spaces is necessary.
It would be
an interesting exercise if all brand managers were asked
to position their products in alternative, possible
thematic spaces, then to go through the process of
ranking these various thematic spaces in terms of
potential appeal to traditional, and perhaps new,
targeted and segmented consumers. Doing this, it seems
to me, would be a proper first step sometimes in
determining even what business one is in and, more
often, precisely what consumer needs are being presumed
and addressed.
So far as I
know, few now think of marketing planning in this way,
and I believe that all marketing would get better if
marketing people approached their craft initially from
the point of view of dealing with the intellectual
discipline inherent in working with thematic spaces.